In 1972, in the Philippines, the president decided to install a military law. This law empowered all to, by then-president, Ferdinand Marcos, and the military. By and by 47 years afterward, many still recall this time simply like the most prosperous time for the Philippines. All that they can remember is what they were thought and the questionable memory or amicability and solicitation in the country. Truth be told, any individual who tested express their genuine contemplations during the 9 years of military law, would be taken from their homes and either tormented, just confined or ‘salvaged’ (executed).
There were stores of encounters, viewpoints, and disputes to whether military law had negative or productive results to authoritative issues, economy, society and culture of the Philippines. Some may express that military law was the darkest scenes in the country’s progressing past and some may extoll Marcos for constraining such a structure, which results in an inexorably ‘prepared Filipinos ‘. In any case, most of them who experienced military law considered it as one of the ghastly memory of the past. Important from the start, anyway on the last part caused distress in the manner that a pioneer sold out his fellowmen.
Batas Militar ordinarily referred to in its English interpretation as ‘Military Law’. As expressed in the 1973 Constitution of the Philippine Republic that the Prime priest as the president may pronounce Martial Law under similar conditions, ‘if there should arise an occurrence of attack, insurgence or defiance, or up and the coming threat thereof, the open security requires it.
The President, be that as it may, utilizing this arrangement may degenerate the Military powers and become a prisoner of eager commanders who might need to practice control through a manikin President, without comparing duty.
