Grab company background Grab is a ride-sharing company based in Singapore. The company partners with hundreds of thousands of local drivers and partners to create an affordable on-demand transportation industry (Grab, 2020). The initial idea was formed in a Harvard Business School 2011’s Business Plan Contest by Anthony Tan and his wife Tan Hooi Ling….
Leadership is an important quality for any person. However, for the president of the country’s leader, it is fundamental. In this essay, I would like to compare the leadership styles of two current presidents: Andrzej Duda the President of Poland and Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin the President of Russia. First, I would like to briefly write…
Introduction Aliko Dangote is an African-Nigerian investor, businessman and the CEO of Dangote Industries/Group; born in 1957. Dangote holds a ‘Business Studies and Administration’ bachelor’s degree from Al-Azhar University, Cairo. Dangote founded the Dangote Group 38 years ago and has managed to establish the business as the largest corporation in West Africa; with most of…
Leadership and Management,
He has accomplished this by foreseeing and setting trends in innovation and style. Jobs has made history in the business oral which, has contributed much to the symbolic image of the idiosyncratic, individualistic Silicon Valley entrepreneur, emphasizing the importance of design and understanding the crucial role aesthetics play in public appeal” (Wisped). His forward-driven mindset…
The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast servant leadership and followership and explain how one depends on the other to fortify an organization. The success of any organization is dependent on having both to succeed. The definition for followership is “capability or willingness to follow a leader.” (Merriam-Webster page 435) The word…
The Caucasian head Coach Bill Yeast is replaced by African American Coach Herman Boone; was to assume an assistant position reporting to Yeast. Remember the Titans was set in a cultural environment that refused to accept the idea of racial equality and how one colored man, coach Herman Boone, changed this. His arrival into town…
Students of leadership have produced theories involving traits,[l] situational interaction, function, behavior, power, vision and charisma, and intelligence among others. Aerie, A. Defines a leader as “a person capable of inspiring and associate others with a dream. ” It is therefore important that organizations have a visionary mission, nice it is a powerful way to…
A large amount of empirical research on effective leadership has sought to identify the types of behaviors that enhance individual and collective performance. The most common research method has been a survey field study with a behavior description questionnaire. In the past half-century, hundreds f survey studies have examined the correlation between leadership behavior and…
A steward leadership is a leadership style that is more democratic instead of autocratic. The employees are the center of this model. This leader is one that assesses the employee in the professional and personal growth. Steward leader follow the model established by Robert Greenleaf in 1977. Mr. Greenleaf’s ten characteristics, those will show the…
The leader’s role involves establishing a clear dream, sharing that vision with there so that they will follow willingly, providing the information, knowledge, and methods to realize that vision, and coordinating and balancing the contradictory interests of all members. A leader comes to the forefront in case of crisis and is able to think and…
Check a list of useful topics on Leadership selected by experts
Essay Topics About Leadership
Leadership Argumentative Essay Topics
A Review of Leadership Theories, Principles and Styles
The Message of Martin Luther King Jr. in His Letter From Birmingham Jail
Lincoln on Leadership and Its Styles
Free Transformational Leadership Book Review Example
The Meaning Of Leadership To Me: Qualities That Create A Leader
The Kind of a Leader I Would Want to Be
Slavery in the Land of the Free Analysis
Philosophy of Nursing Leadership Skills
Feedback To Group Members Course Works Example
The Definition Of Leadership: What Does Leadership Mean To Me
A Characteristics of a Perfect Leader from My Viewpoint
A Strong and Effective Leader is Essential for a Successful Organization
Leadership in the Nursing Profession
Good Essay On Communism
Reasons Why I Want To Be A Leader In The Technological World
The Role of Leadership in Different Aspects of People’s Life
Leadership Descriptive Essay Topics
A Literary Analysis of a Letter by Martin Luther King
The Leadership Style of Abraham Lincoln
Essay On Integrating Leadership and Communication Styles
Short Biography Of Jeff Bezos
The Required Managerial Skills: Flexibility Accountability and Leadership in The Workplace
Frederick Douglass Deserves Recognition on His Works
Why I Want to Be a Leader
Research Paper On Model by Victor Vroom and Philip Yetto
Leadership Style Of Jeff Bezos
The Role of Emotional Intelligence, Motivation and Self-regulation in Leadership
A Comparison in the Art of Persuasion
Becoming a True Leader in Modern World
Vietnam and the Twentieth Century Experience Essay Samples
Management Vs Leadership: The Good And The Bad Of Being A Manager
Why Emotional Intelligence is Important in Leadership
The Letter From Birmingham Jail by Martin Luther King as an Expression of the Fight for the Equality of Man
Leadership Persuasive Essay Topics
Entrepreneur and Leaders Are Born Or Are Made
Management and Leadership Literature Review Sample
Management Vs. Leadership: The Hard Work Of A Manager
Early Leadership Philosophies and Asumptions
Mahatma Gandhi and British Tyranny
Leadership in My Life: Personal Experience
Good Example Of The Impact of the IOM Report on Nursing Essay
Factors That Influenced My Leadership Potential Throughout My Life
What Makes a Well-rounded, Happy and Smart Learner
Reason to Follow Mahatma Gandhi
Meaning of Leadership in People’s Life
Good Essay About Vietnam War
Being the Democratic Leader in the Nursing Field
Discussion on What True Leadership Means
An Examination of Unbiased Gender Leadership in the Articles of Multiple Authors
Leadership Intelligences in the 21st Century World
Leadership Informative Essay Topics
Departmental Human Resource Officer Personal Statements Example
An Analysis on the Correlation of Leadership and Retention
Effective Leadership in Long Term Care
Role of Leadership in My Life
Free Essay About Leadership Experiences
The Main Characteristics of an Ethical Leader
The Case of the Failing Twin
Example Of Fiorina Carly Research Paper
The Importance of Leadership and Professional Development for Teamwork
Barack Obama: A Master Class in Public Speaking
Good Leadership Development Essay Example
An Importance and Role of a Leadership on The Workplace
Glossophobia (Fear of Public Speaking): Are You Glossophobic?
Heidrick & Struggles Article Review
The Importance of Leadership and Influencing Qualities
Agents of Socialization and the Influence They Had On My Life
Leadership Comparison and Contrast Essay Topics
Leadership Types Course Work Sample
The Importance of Emotional Intelligence in Leadership
Steve Jobs Commencement Speech
Sample Essay On Seyyid Hussein Nasr
Analysis of The Importance of Management and Leadership in Healthcare
Analysis of Steve Jobs Stanford Commencement Address
Romantic Relationship Essay
Overview of The Path-goal Theory of Leadership
Apple’s Decision to Bring Back Steve Jobs
The Kingdom of Morocco Course Works Example
Importance of Leadership in Social Life and Business
Steve Jobs Life Story
Good Example Of Case Study On Management and Leadership
Progressive vs. Regressive
Good Philip and Matsushita Essay Example
Papers on Islamic Ethics on Tax Evasion
Definition of Leadership
A leader is someone who can influence others and who has managerial authority. Leadership is what leaders do. More specifically, it’s the process of influencing a group to achieve goals. Group Leadership Leadership is concerned with control and power in a group. Leadership can be aimed at either maintaining the interpersonal relationships in the group or prodding the group to achieve its task. Kinds of Leadership Groups typically benefit from two kinds of leadership i. E.
This kind of leadership refers to group leadership that focuses on the implosion of tasks. Members look to instrumental leadership to make plans, give orders, and get things done. Characteristics of instrumental leadership Instrumental leaders usually have formal, secondary relations with other group members. They give orders and rewards and punish members according to their contribution to the group’s efforts. Enjoy more respect from members when successful. Their main goal is the completion of tasks.
Expressive leadership is group leadership that focuses on the group’s well-being. For example, the democratic style of leadership is an example of the expressive dervish. Characteristics of Expressive leadership Expressive leaders take less interest in achieving goals than in promoting the well-being of members, raising group morale, and minimizing tensions and conflicts among the group members. Expressive leaders build more personal and primary ties. They show sympathy to their group members.
They generally receive more personal affection. Leadership Styles Definition: Leadership styles refer to the various patterns of behavior favored by leaders during the process of directing and influencing workers. Sociologists describe leadership in terms of decision-making styles. The three major types of leadership are the following: Authoritarian or autocratic leadership. Democratic or Participative leadership. Laissez-fairer leadership. Although good leaders use all three styles, with one of them normally dominant, bad leaders tend to stick with one style.
In the past several decades, management experts have undergone a revolution in how they define leadership and what their attitudes are toward it. They have gone from a very classical autocratic approach to a very creative, participative approach. Somewhere along the line, it was determined that not everything old was bad and not everything we was good. Rather, different styles were needed for different situations and each leader needed to know when to exhibit a particular approach. Authoritarian Leadership This is often considered the classical approach.
It is one in which the manager retains as much power and decision-making authority as possible. The manager does not consult employees, nor are they allowed to give any input. Employees are expected to obey orders without receiving any explanations. The motivation environment is produced by creating a structured set of rewards and punishments. This style is used when leaders tell their employees what they want to be done and how they want it accomplished, without getting the advice of their followers.
Some of the appropriate conditions to use it are when you have all the information to solve the problem, you are short on time, and your employees are well motivated. This leadership style has been greatly criticized during the past 30 years. Some studies say that organizations with many autocratic leaders have higher turnover and absenteeism than other organizations. These studies say that autocratic leaders: Rely on threats and punishment to influence employees. Do not allow for employee input. Autocratic leadership is not all bad. Sometimes it is the most effective style to Use.
These situations can include New, untrained employees who do not know which tasks to perform or which procedures to follow. Effective supervision can be provided only through detailed orders and instructions. Manager’s power is challenged by an employee. Democratic or Participative The democratic leadership style is also called the participative style as it encourages employees to be a part of the decision-making. The democratic manager keeps his or her employees informed about everything that affects their work and shares decision-making and problem-solving responsibilities.
This style requires the leader to be a coach who has the final say but gathers information from staff members before making a decision. Democratic leadership can produce high-quality and high quantity work for long periods of time. Many employees like the trust they receive and respond with cooperation, team spirit, and high morale. Typically the democratic leader: Develops plans to help employees evaluate their own performance. Encourages employees to grow on the job and be promoted. Recognizes and encourages achievement. Like the other styles, the democratic style is not always appropriate.
It is cost-successful when used with highly skilled or experienced employees or when implementing operational changes or resolving individual or group problems. This is normally used when you have part of the information, and your employees have other parts. Note that a leader is not expected to know everything this is why you employ knowledgeable and skillful employees. Using this style is of mutual benefit it allows them to become part of the team and allows you to make better decisions. Laissez-fairer leadership Laissez fairer is a French word meaning noninterference in the affairs of others. Laissez means to let, allow and fairer means to do.
The laissez-fairer leadership style
Is also known as the “”hands-off”” style. It is one in which the manager provides little or no direction and gives employees as much freedom as possible. All authority or power is given to the employees and they must determine goals, make decisions, and resolve problems on their own. In this style, the leader allows the employees to make the decisions. However, the leader is still responsible for the decisions that are made. This is used when employees are able to analyze the situation and determine what needs to be done and how to do it. You cannot do everything!
You must set priorities and delegate certain tasks. This is an effective style to use when: Employees are highly skilled, experienced, and educated. Employees have pride in their work and the drive to do it successfully on their own. Outside experts, such as staff specialists or consultants are being used. Employees are trustworthy and experienced. Varying Leadership Style While the proper leadership style depends on the situation, there are three other factors that also influence which leadership style to Use. The manager’s personal background. What personality, knowledge, values, ethics, and experiences does the manager have?
What does he or she think will work? The employees are being supervised. Employees are individuals with different personalities and backgrounds. The leadership style managers use will vary depending upon the individual employee and what he or she will respond best to The company. The traditions, values, philosophy, and concerns of the to. The company will influence how a manager acts. There are a lot of arguments for and against each of the effective leadership styles. For example, the followers of an authoritarian leader are more prone to having low motivation and morale.
They may find it difficult to get inspired because the leader is more impersonal, ask-oriented, demanding, and not considerate of their opinions. However, despite this, there are situations where an authoritarian leadership style is the most effective. Such as when time is short when the leader has all the information and a quick decision is needed. Anything other than an authoritarian leader will result in poorer outcomes. Theories of Leadership People have been interested in leadership since they have started coming together in groups to accomplish goals.
However, it wasn’t until the early part of the twentieth century that researchers usually began to study it. These early dervish theories focused on the leader (trait theories) and how the leader interacted with his or her group members (behavioral theories) while subsequent theories looked at other variables such as situational factors and skill level. While many different leadership theories have emerged, most can be classified as one of eight major types: ‘Great Man’ Theory Early research on leadership was based on the study of people who were already great leaders.
These people were often from the aristocracy, as few from the lower classes had the opportunity to lead. This contributed to the notion that leadership had something to do with Redding. The idea of the Great Man also strayed into the mythic domain, with notions that in times of need, a Great Man would arise, almost by magic. This was easy to verify, by pointing to people such as Eisenhower and Churchill. The term “”Great Man”” was used because, at the time, leadership was thought of primarily as a male quality, especially in terms of military leadership.
In searching for measurable leadership traits, researchers have taken two approaches: Comparing the traits of those who have emerged as leaders with the traits who have not and Comparing the traits of effective leaders tit those of ineffective leaders. Early research on leadership was based on the psychological focus of the day, which was of people having inherited characteristics or traits. Attention was thus put on discovering these traits, often by studying successful leaders, but with the underlying assumption that if other people could also be found with these traits, then they, too, could also become great leaders.
Trait theories often identify particular personality or behavioral characteristics shared by leaders. But if particular traits are key features of leadership, how do we explain people who possess those qualities but are not adders? This question is one of the difficulties in using trait theories to explain leadership. Behavioral theory When it became evident that effective leaders did not seem to have a particular set of distinguishing traits, researchers tried to isolate the behavior characteristics of effective leaders.
In other words, rather than try to figure out who effective leaders are, researchers tried to determine what effective leaders do i. E. How they delegate tasks, how they communicate with and try to motivate their followers or employees and so on. Behaviors, unlike traits, can be learned, so it is followed that individuals trained n appropriate leadership behaviors would be able to lead more effectively. Participative theory A Participative Leader, rather than taking autocratic decisions, seeks to involve other people in the process, possibly including subordinates, peers, superiors and other stakeholders.
Often, however, as it is within the managers’ whim to give or deny control to his or her subordinates, most participative activity is within the immediate team. These leaders encourage participation and contributions from group members and help group members feel more relevant and committed to the decision-making process. In eradicative theories, however, the lender retains the right to allow the input of others. The level of participation may also depend on the type of decision being made.
Decisions on how to implement goals may be highly participative, whilst decisions during subordinate performance evaluations are more likely to be taken by the manager. Contingency theory contingency theories are a class of behavioral theory that contends that there is no one best way of leading and that a leadership style that is effective in some situations may not be successful in others. Contingency theories of leadership focus on particular variables related o the environment that might determine which particular style of leadership is best suited for the situation.
According to this theory, no leadership style is best in all situations. Success depends upon a number of variables, including the leadership style, qualities of the followers, and aspects of the situation. This theory focuses on the following factors: Task requirement. Peers expectations and behavior. Employees’ characteristics, expectations and behavior. Culture and policies. Situational theory Organizational One of the major contingency approaches to leadership is Paul Hershey and Kenneth H. Blanchard’s “”situational leadership model”” which holds that the most effective leadership style varies with the “”readiness”” of employees.
When a decision is needed, an effective leader does not just fall into a single preferred style, such as using transactional or transformational methods. In practice, as they say, things are not that simple. Factors that affect situational decisions include the motivation and capability of followers. This, in turn, is affected by factors within the particular situation. The relationship between followers and the leader may be another factor that affects leader behavior as much as it does follower behavior. The leader’s perception of the follower and the situation will affect what they do rather than the truth of the situation.
The leader’s perception of themselves and other factors such as stress and mood will also modify the leaders’ behavior.
Transformational or Charismatic theory
Working for a Transformational Leader can be a wonderful and uplifting experience. They put passion and energy into everything. They care about you and want you to succeed. One area of growing interest is the study of individuals who have an exceptional impact on their organizations. These individuals may be called charismatic”” or “”transformational”” leaders.
First, many large companies including IBM, GM etc have embarked on organizational “”transformations”” programs of extensive changes that must be accomplished in short periods of time. Bass’s theory of transformational leadership Bass defined transformational leadership in terms of how the leader affects followers, who are intended to trust, admire and respect the transformational leader. He identified three ways in which leaders transform followers: Increasing their awareness of task importance and value. Getting them to focus first on a team or organizational goals, rather Han their own interests. Activating their higher-order needs.
Bass has recently noted that authentic transformational leadership is grounded in moral foundations that are based on four components: Idealized influence Inspirational motivation Intellectual stimulation Individualized consideration Transactional or Management theory Management theories (also known as “”Transactional theories””) focus on the role of supervision, organization, and group performance. These theories base leadership on a system of reward and punishment. Managerial theories are often used in business; when employees are successful, they are rewarded; when they fail, they are reprimanded or punished.
The early stage of Transactional Leadership is in negotiating the contract whereby the subordinate is given a salary and other benefits, and the company gets authority over the subordinate. When the Transactional Leader allocates work to a subordinate, they are considered to be fully responsible for it, whether or not they have the resources or capability to carry it out. When things go wrong, then the subordinate is considered to be personally at fault and is punished for their failure (just as they are rewarded for succeeding).
Videos about This I Believe
- Great leadership starts with self-leadership | Lars Sudmann | TEDxUCLouvain
2. Leadership Explained in 5 minutes by Simon Sinek
3. 4 Tips to Improve Leadership Skills | Brian Tracy
Interesting infographics about Leadership
- Be a leader, not a Manager
2. Traits of a Good Leadership
3. 5 Essential Leadership Skills