Thomas Kuhn’s View of Science

Updated September 10, 2022

Download Paper

File format: .pdf, .doc, available for editing

Thomas Kuhn’s View of Science essay

Get help to write your own 100% unique essay

Get custom paper

78 writers are online and ready to chat

This essay has been submitted to us by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our writers.

In 1947, Thomas Samuel Kuhn accepted an invitation from the president of his school, (James B. Conant), to be one of his assistants. He was to assist Conant in creating a historically based course for undergraduates. He took on a project that investigated the origins of seventeenth century mechanics and this is what caused a change in his image of science. Once he saw science differently, he decided that he needed introduce the public and the scientific world to this new way of seeing science.

Kuhn struggled to understand Aristotle’s idea of motion in Physic. He found it difficult trying to make sense of the idea, because he was using Newtonian, (or classical mechanics by Sir Isaac Newton), assumptions and categories. Newtons laws made sense for the late seventeenth century, but not for the period before the common era or B.C.E. He figured out he had to read the idea of motion using assumptions and categories from Aristotle’s time. Once Kuhn read the idea using Aristotelian mechanics and was able to get inside the mind of Aristotle, he had a better understanding and view from the perspective of his era. This realization made him decide to be a philosopher of science by doing the history of science.

Kuhn felt that that logic was necessary but can also be insufficient for justifying knowledge. He proved that logic is not able to guarantee the original image of something as scientific advancements are accumulated. He also proved the importance of language and meaning and a need for a “scientific language”. A language or terms that would separate the professional scientific world form all others. He also was able to differentiate creative science from textbook science. He wanted to develop a new image for science, because he felt there was a public misconception of the subject. He attributed these misconceptions to introductory textbook courses that portrayed science as a fixed body of never changing facts. After, discussing things with his friends and Conant, Kuhn was able to present his students with a more detailed image of science. He believed that the history of science was the best way to present the true nature of science to the world.

Kuhn went on to introduce an alternative approach to the methodology of science. He introduced conceptual frame works and a way for scientists to organize facts. He reconstructed the Copernican revolution by giving it conceptual schemes. Kuhn believed that scientific progression was not a straight-line process from problem to solution, but in a cumulative way. Data, facts, and observations complied together was truly how scientific progression occurred. He believed that science should be studies by what scientists do most of the time.

Thomas Kuhn’s View of Science essay

Remember. This is just a sample

You can get your custom paper from our expert writers

Get custom paper

Thomas Kuhn’s View of Science. (2020, Nov 11). Retrieved from https://samploon.com/thomas-kuhns-view-of-science/


What did Thomas Kuhn contribution to science?
In 1962, Kuhn's renowned The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Kuhn argued for an episodic model in which periods of conceptual continuity where there is cumulative progress, which Kuhn referred to as periods of "normal science", were interrupted by periods of revolutionary science. The discovery of "anomalies" during revolutions in science leads to new paradigms. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Structure) helped to inaugurate a revolution—the 1960s historiographic revolution—by providing a new image of science. For Kuhn, scientific revolutions involved paradigm shifts that punctuated periods of stasis or normal science.
What does Thomas Kuhn say about science?
Thomas Kuhn - Science as a Paradigm Thomas Kuhn argued that science does not evolve gradually towards truth . Science has a paradigm which remains constant before going through a paradigm shift when current theories can't explain some phenomenon, and someone proposes a new theory.
What is Kuhn's normal science?
Normal science, identified and elaborated on by Thomas Samuel Kuhn in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, is the regular work of scientists theorizing, observing, and experimenting within a settled paradigm or explanatory framework .
What is Kuhn's scientific community theory?
A scientific community cannot practice its trade without some set of received beliefs . These beliefs form the foundation of the "educational initiation that prepares and licenses the student for professional practice".
We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

I'm Peter!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out