Statistically speaking, sixty-one percent of 6,000 people surveyed said they believe AI will make the world a better place. It has been claimed that our day to day careers can be changed into a more convenient, interesting and safer way of life. However, some disagree with how beneficial these new inventions are. There is also much controversy over the regulations on Artificial Intelligence. How can these devices contribute to our daily lives and make everything greater?
Senior and legal researchers at George Mason University, Adam Thierer and Jennifer Huddleston Skees wrote an online opinionated article on April 30, 2018, titled, “Technology Makes Our Lives More Interesting, Convenient, And Safer: We’ve Only Recently Begun To Tap The True Potential Of AI.” The corporation that published this is insidesource.com, who claimed that it is a non-biased news organization, excluding any political party views and focusing on only facts.
Thierer and Skees addressed the topic of Artificial Intelligence (AI), advanced robotics, and newly created inventions. The authors supported their argument by clarifying unfavorable opinions and articulating more on the benefits and possibilities of AI and other new technology it can offer. They also wrote their article in a persuasive tone to address the mature and sophisticated audience of insidesource.com.
I believe Adam Thierer and Jennifer Skees were effective in discussing the strategies and arguments regarding the great uses of AI and newly invented technology to their audience.
Adam Thierer and Jennifer Skees argue that new technology should no longer be feared but instead embraced for safer uses. As stated in the article, “Artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced robotics are no longer relegated to the scary technologies seen in old ‘Terminator’ movies. They’re already here, and in the real world we need not to be suspicious of them,” (Thierer and Skees).
What the authors mean by this is AI and advanced inventions are the new era of innovation that can help assist humans and serve future needs. Past and false assumptions are no longer needed to be scared of as said by the authors. According to Thierer and Skees, “These technologies aren’t taking over our lives, but instead are helping solve real problems and improve our everyday lives.”
Simply put, AI isn’t necessarily taking over our lifestyles, more so integrating into them. The article opposes all negative information and foreboding effects on new technology, explaining the plethora of possibilities this newly invented technology can offer.
The authors presented and established credibility by presenting relevant evidence and expressing statements related to the topic. Writers Thierer and Skees compare the reasonings in critics of AI including Elon Musk and late Stephen Hawking to other individuals who are in favor of AI as evidence. The critics concluded that,“If we’re not careful, it will surpass and destroy us.”
However, the 2017 Mercatus Center study notes, “Such concerns are nothing new and have been around for more than 50 years” (Thierer and Skees). The authors use these statements to prove that AI has already been around for a while, providing evidence utilizing the controversy between the critics and supporters of AI.
Thierer and Skees demonstrated, organized and structured in a way that is effective for their audience by making it easy to understand and straight to the point. The writers appeal to logos by including theories and scientific facts of Artificial Intelligence. In addition, the authors description of the “Terminator” as scary was a very persuasive appeal to pathos.
Many interesting factors are associated with the new technology, especially in Artificial Intelligence. Based on the article, Thierer and Skees claimed that, “AI doesn’t just make things more convenient and enjoyable—it’s also empowering people and even saving lives.” In other words, AI has a lot to offer and can make lives more exciting.
For example, machine learning in autonomous vehicles can be fascinating in many aspects, as talked about in the article. It is not only for automobiles, the article also explained that AI could even accommodate elderly citizens with their medications to encourage independence. Thierer and Skees also stated that, “Robots and AI assist children with autism to learn how to communicate and interact in social situations, by providing opportunities with social mediators when therapists and educators aren’t available.”
Mainly, the authors are pointing out the abundant possibilities of AI, and that children with disorders such as autism can benefit from this new technology. The way the authors organize their text by using examples and facts is effective in convincing the audience to believe that AI and new technology can provide greater means. Interesting and exciting factors of new technology help persuade the reader, as well as the organization and the listing of possibilities in their writings.
The article states that the technology of today is made so convenient that humanity is given the option of never leaving their homes for their everyday needs and wants. The authors expressed that, “To Siri or Alexa answering our questions, most of us already interact with some form of AI on a daily basis” (Thierer and Skees).
In other words, the writers believe that there are many other conveniences regarding new technology including musical benefits, the exploration of interests of companies like Amazon and Netflix, and the use of traffic apps and fraud alerts. Additionally, the article indicated that modern automobiles could be equipped with driving assist systems and alert warnings in case of any potential hazards that can occur, making it convenient to travel without the risk of danger.
AI can offer many conveniences as well, being geolocation, mapping sources, and more which are listed in the article. Listing the comforts of technology and AI compliment how useful it is, effectively persuading the reader with prepared statements. The way the writers point out the benefits and provide evidence in the form of quotes is effective in further backing up their claim.
If society accepts the production of AI, the article claims that it shouldn’t be as regulated or delayed to fully unlock the convenient, safety, and exciting benefits it can offer. Authors Thierer and Skees wrote, “First, as we’ve already seen from the wide variety of its use, it’s hard to define what should be considered AI clearly. As a result, it would be difficult to come up with a specific legal definition of what a new agency, law or regulation would apply to…”
In making this comment, Thierer and Skees urge to keep the rules uncomplicated, as to not limit the future benefits of technology. Secondly, “America’s current environment of ‘permissionless innovation’ has encouraged rapid prototyping, competition, and improvement in the field of AI” (Thierer and Skees). The authors confirm the rapid growth of AI in today’s generation despite government restrictions.
However, they also point out that burdensome regulations will prolong the acceptation of AI, losing a great number of inventions taken to the market, or even developed in, the process. The authors present relevant evidence using quotes and ongoing lists to support their assumptions. They also structured their article in an orderly and consistent way, providing numerous facts on rapidly growing Artificial Intelligence to persuade their audience effectively. The use of expert testimony in the article appeal to logos.
To conclude my analysis, Adam Thierer and Jennifer Skees believe that Artificial Intelligence and newly invented technology should not be frightened of in order to achieve the benefits it can offer. The article provided their readers with sufficient claims to prove their argument. Additionally, the authors justify that modern technology should indeed be given a chance. It is expressed in the article that, “Rather than taking our lives, AI is slowly being integrating into our lives to make them better,” (Thierer & Skees).
In other words, the past remarks about AI being a negative impact on our lives should be forgotten, because the technology has already been intertwined with the present. Today’s society should accept what has already begun and enjoy the advantages it could suggest in the near future. Whether it’s beneficial or not to our daily lives, society must give it a try to find the real potential it can offer.
From this article, I’ve concluded that Adam Thierer and Jennifer Skees were both persuasive and successful at bringing awareness to its reader about the endless possibilities of new technology. It is clear that technology of today will put us in good hands and should be allowed to perform as it claims. I want to give an opportunity, a chance for newly invented technology such as AI to make our lives worth living: a life of safety, interest, and convenience.