Should the Death Penalty be Abolished?

This is FREE sample
This text is free, available online and used for guidance and inspiration. Need a 100% unique paper? Order a custom essay.
  • Any subject
  • Within the deadline
  • Without paying in advance
Get custom essay

The death penalty has been established as a punishment for crimes since the eighteenth century and this system of execution has lasted to the present day. Those that are for the death penalty claim that the death penalty will work as a deterrence and is the only way for retribution against murderers. Both issues are highly debatable and have been a subject of criticism. Although most of the society argue that culprit’s lives must be ended up by the death penalty, I would say it unfairly gives governments the power to take human life and perpetuates social injustices by disproportionately targeting people of color and people who cannot afford good attorneys and may become a victim of wrongful executions. Moreover, there are better methods to punish the offenders according to the high cost of the death penalty or even more cost-effective.

The death penalty deters crime at some point. However, it can strip people’s life, and therefore they are sentenced to die carrying other people’s blame. Here is the real example of the wrong execution of 14 years old child whose name was George Stinney who was the youngest person in modern times to be put to death. He was interrogated without his parents and the absence of an attorney had a tremendous impact which most likely gave rise to unfair execution. The most shocking part of this story is that it took 70 years after his execution to exonerate him. This case makes more sense than just indicating the government’s misstep. The incidental negligence is far more damaging than intentional obscurity.

The claim that the death penalty should be applied for the criminal is not rational. The government needs any other alternative penalty for murder in which a wise logical presence. For instance, Osama Bin Laden who was perceived as the most craved terrorist and murdered by the US and western collaborators. His death did not diminish the number of murders by his group neither did it deter terrorist activities. Hence, here is the question: what the death penalty brings? There has to be a distinctive option to manage with crimes committed by perpetrators.

For example, deprivation of liberty which counts as a manageable way to limit people’s freedom and ability to take any further independent decisions. Given the fact that offenders are full-fledged and healthy, there is another idea that involves the implementation of works for free that others are less likely to do. In other words, they have been taken hostage and serve the government bringing their benefit and simultaneously paying for their improprieties. It works effectively both to punish offenders and to protect society at the charge of the death penalty. Besides, it is faster, cheaper, and various things could be arranged from the government perspective as well as justice at the highest level.

The subject being examined is that with the awareness of human rights, the death penalty should not be a decent policy established in the 21st century. Progressively, the number of human right supporters rise who fight against the death penalty. Despite being a criminal, this person did not choose to born the same way as no one must judge whether that person should still live or not. Through the use of real-life models, investigations show that the death penalty does not reduce the number of crimes per person. Furthermore, executing a death row internee is a quivering process.

There can be long suspensions in the execution practice, wrong executions, and as soon as we become more educated, our choice significantly changes in terms of matters accordingly. For all the reasons stated above, the states should abolish the death penalty.


Cite this paper

Should the Death Penalty be Abolished?. (2020, Sep 08). Retrieved from https://samploon.com/should-the-death-penalty-be-abolished/



Do you think death penalty should be abolished?
Reasons to abolish the death penalty Execution is the ultimate, irrevocable punishment: the risk of executing an innocent person can never be eliminated . Since 1973, for example, more than 184 prisoners sent to death row in the USA have later been exonerated or released from death row on grounds of innocence.
What would happen if the death penalty was abolished?
If the death penalty was abolished, it would mean that convicted criminals would no longer be put to death as punishment for their crimes. This would be a major change in the criminal justice system, and it is not clear what would happen next.
why the death penalty should be abolished?
1. The death penalty is an inhumane punishment that does not align with the values of most modern societies. 2. There is also a risk that innocent people could be put to death, as has happened in the past.
Why we should oppose the death penalty?
Execution of the innocent The most common and most cogent argument against capital punishment is that sooner or later, innocent people will get killed, because of mistakes or flaws in the justice system . Witnesses, (where they are part of the process), prosecutors and jurors can all make mistakes.
We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Peter is on the line!

Don't settle for a cookie-cutter essay. Receive a tailored piece that meets your specific needs and requirements.

Check it out