If we were to look back into history, we can find many forms of violence or conflict. Conflict is an ongoing action that the human species seem to engage in, regardless of how people may feel about it. Cultures around the globe will have a different perspective on conflict or war, some may favor it, while others frown upon the action. In this paper, I will be writing about the ethical issues on war, and how different cultures may view it. First and foremost, war is described as an abuse of human rights. War involves actively killing or injuring people. According to our text, every human culture has felt that there needs to be a justification of taking a life morally. There are two areas in which moral judgements fall into about war. First area is the reason is the action of war, why exactly is this the option? Second area is the way the war is conducted. There is an issue of how a war should be handled or fought rather than why war is the option. There are certain principles that relate to the conduction of war. These principles are: who to fight, the amount of force used, weaponry force, and the roles of international convention.
Not only is war a negative connotation with human rights, it also changes society. War has life changing effects on society, especially on victims and aggressors. Although war can financially establish a country and boost their economy, it has negative connotation on politics, society and economics. Post war effects can include mass destruction, negative consequences on infrastructure, changes in public health services and social order. If we look at war from a religious perspective, some people who believe in faith are often led to believe that their religion is set at an ethical standard. In our article, it had stated that these religious groups can be contradicting or paradoxical.
Many of the religious groups value the human life and consider it sacred. Although they may find human life to be valued, some religious scriptures and religious authority have influenced the right to kill human life. Religion is not the influence of war and other variations of conflict. People will try and create reasons to kill or injure others without any reason to cite the will of God. Some of the cruelest acts in history have been based upon race or hatred, rather than religion. This can relate back to the era of the Holocaust. Hitler acted upon the races as well as the hatred of the Jewish. It may be rooted in our history that we act upon this hatred because we consider others not one of “us”.
127 our experts are availableright now
Religion and violence can go hand in hand if one views someone disgracing God, or an enemy of God. Religious violence can include a ruthless and intense character to perform such violence. Countries such as India, Pakistan, Nigeria and Indonesia are part of the religious violence sanction. One religion that avoids injury to any creature is Hinduism. Hinduism had influenced other religion such as Buddhism and Jainism. Buddhism influences the need for people to be aware of compassion and the obligation to not injure others. This means that there is a virtue of not killing others, as well as animals. Hinduists and Buddhists believe in the law of Karma. This means that if evil people still succeed in life, even after doing something wrong, Karma will eventually come back and make them pay for their previous actions. Believing in the Law of Karma can motivate or influence people who follow this faith, to overcome any selfishness or hostility. This selfishness or hostility can lead to violence, which in then turn can lead to a type of war.
Unfortunately, in today’s world, there are still advocates of aggressive religious war. Each religion has their own definition of ethical processes when it comes to war, or violent conflict. When it comes to ethical rules and principles, it ultimately depends on the person and what they believe is right or wrong. We all have different aspects of war as well as ethical actions. Some may believe it’s okay to injure others in result of anger and selfishness, while some may find that ethically wrong.
