This article discusses research that is suggested to prove who is healthier between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Published on April 27th, a study done of 666 homeschooled children from the ages of six to twelve compared 405 of the children who had been partially or fully vaccinated, and 261 unvaccinated children. Researchers investigated the overall health of the children based off the mother’s reports of vaccinations and the physician-diagnosed illness. The results found that children who were vaccinated had four times more likely chance to be diagnosed with autism.
The research also showed that children who were not vaccinated were 22 times more likely to n o require an allergy medication. Lastly, it was found that vaccinated children had a 2.4 more likely chance to have been diagnosed with any chronic illness. There have been numerous studies done to show that there is no correlation between autism and vaccines but this study states that the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), continuously fails to mention the federal government must acknowledge vaccines role in inhibiting autism. Although, this study suggest that brain damage and nervous system damage is not something that is just now occurring with vaccines, but that many other detrimental health outcomes can come from vaccines as well.
After reading this study, I want to feel that some of the information provided is biased and that the study only looked over pre-existing information instead of testing for new information as well as taking into consideration the pre-existing data. I do, however, believe that they had a good number of participants and a good age range for the children as well. I feel as if this research could be expanded unto more, by testing a new group of children still within the age range but from other states. It would be interesting to see how results may possibly vary from the east to the west coast or from the north to the south. The results of this article determined that unvaccinated children were healthy if not more healthy than vaccinated children.
127 our experts are availableright now
This article was published in 2017 so I would say that this information is still relatively new and not out dated. I think that those researching could have been more specific with the last result that was found which was that vaccinated children were 2.4 more likely to have been diagnosed with any chronic illness than unvaccinated children. I feel as if “any chronic illness” can refer to a multitude of things, so providing possibly examples of which types of illnesses it could be may have made that result a little bit more specific.
The purpose of this article is to the health of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. The study takes place on children between the ages of six to twelve. The information was obtained through a questionnaire divided amongst four states, that was filled out by mothers of their homeschooled child. The results found, that vaccinated children were less likely to be diagnosed with chicken pox and pertussis (whooping cough). Although, the vaccinated were more suspect to pneumonia, otitis media (ear infection), allergies and neurodevelopmental disorders. More specifically, children who were male and vaccinated were named to be associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Overall, the findings suggested that vaccinated children were at higher risk to disease and neurodevelopmental disorders than the children who were not vaccinated, but that unvaccinated children were still not completely safe, making these results somewhat of a tie between who is healthier.
I think this article showed good factual and data driven evidence that clearly displayed their findings. Providing a little bit of table data that was recorded from the actual participants of the study make me feel as if this study is credible, alongside the fact that this study was done in 2017, making it still relevant information. I think that this study could expand its horizons and involve larger and more independent samples and possibly a better research design to get better and more accurate results.
This article discusses the results of a survey that shows if unvaccinated children are healthy if not healthier. In 2010 this survey was conducted and about 12,000 surveys were submitted. Only the health of entirely unvaccinated children was evaluated. The responders to the survey were from the United States, Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. This study showed that most of the unvaccinated children were males, primarily between the ages of 0-2, 2-4, and 5-6 years of age. The children were not breastfed for no more than six months and the parents referred their children to antibiotics as their form of illness prevention.
The results of the survey concluded that less than 10 percent of children who are not vaccinated have suffered from allergies of any kind. 0.2 percent of the unvaccinated children had suffered from asthma, in comparison to vaccinated children whose stats were 14-15 percent in Australia,4.7 percent in Germany and six percent in the United States. ADHD was present in one to two percent of unvaccinated children. Middle ear infections were less than 0.5 percent, but in Germany 11 percent of the children suffered from this. Lastly, only four of the unvaccinated children out of the surveyed 7,600, were reported with severe autism. In each of the four cases, the mother of the child showed test results that present high levels of mercury. Around 1 in 100 children in the United States suffer from this and 1 in every 38 boys from the United Kingdom. In conclusion, not vaccinating is does not provide any guarantee that a child will be healthy or unhealthy, but from the survey results, unvaccinated children seem to be just as healthy if not more than vaccinated children.
I believe that if this test was to be done again, the results may vary or differ substantially because this survey was done in 2010, it has been nine years since then, and a lot has changed in the health of children now than before. With that being said, I think that the results are credible for that time being, but for today, I’m not sure how well those numbers would stand. Lastly, I feel as if the results were a little broad, in the sense of the design of the test but the variation of countries of which this survey took place is very good.
The purpose of this article is to show the difference in how vaccinated versus unvaccinated children adapt in their first five years of life. The test studied 25 children who have completed the full course of their childhood vaccination schedule and compared them to 25 children who had no vaccinations done within the first five years of their life. Specific parameters were set to specify the results, these include, measles, pertussis, poliomyelitis (polio), tetanus, and tuberculosis. From the 25 children who were vaccinated, there was only one child that had a mild case of measles at the age of two and a half. Four of the children from the 25 vaccinated, had what was suspected as whooping cough (pertussis), but was never diagnosed as such. The unvaccinated children consisted of two children who passed away from measles before the ages of three. While 11 other children of the unvaccinated came down with measles during the outbreak of 1986. One child of the unvaccinated group died of tetanus during the study period. In conclusion, the results within themselves show that vaccination proves a child to be healthier than a child who is not vaccinated.
I do not believe this source to be very credible because it is an outdated study. It mentions a case of measles outbreak, when there has not been a major outbreak like the one in 1986 in 2019 within the past five years. I also think that the sample size for this survey was very small. 50 children does not determine the results for an entire population of children, and it was unclear of what or how the test design was conducted.
This article discusses the peer reviewed study of vaccinated and unvaccinated children. This survey was completed on children of ages six through twelve. 39 percent of the children were unvaccinated. Included in the data that was collected were pregnancy experiences from the mother, birth histories, chronic and acute conditions, any medications, and the use or help from healthcare providers. The results showed that children who were indeed vaccinated had a lesser likely chance of being diagnosed with the chicken pox and pertussis (whooping cough). Although, the vaccinated children were more likely to be diagnosed with infections, allergies and NDD (neurodevelopmental disorders) such as autism, ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) or a learning disability. Differences between the vaccinated and unvaccinated, with attention to acute illness, showed that overall there is no significant difference between the two. Chronic illness however, showed that vaccinated children were up one to nine percent times more likely to be diagnosed with NDD, ADHD, or ASD, allergies or learning disabilities. There was no significant difference between the two populations regarding illnesses such as cancer or diabetes.
Since the information in the article is based off data from 2017, I think the information is still credible and worthy of keeping note of. Popular age range when comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated children seems six to twelve, so there is a good range of sample size within this study. This study could be even more concise by letting the readers know, how many of each child did they take from each age. I feel as if the more the better the results.
The purpose of this article is to show statistic findings about vaccinated and unvaccinated children. 11,817 interviews were conduced in the homes of children that range between the ages of four to seventeen, 17,647 children were gathered, those of which 9,175 were male and 8,499 were female. Of these children, 991 had no vaccinations in their lifetime. The information about the children was provided by the parents and pre-determined diseases were taken into consideration. The survey took place in California in the areas San Diego, Sonoma, Orange, Sacramento, and Marin. In Oregon, the counties included Multnomah, Marion, Jackson, and Lane. The study displayed the results specifying vaccinated versus unvaccinated males. If the male were vaccinated, he had a 155 percent more likely chance to have NDD and 224 percent chance of having ADHD than the unvaccinated boys. For the female population, there was so significant difference noted for the occurrence of NDD although typically, females represent about twenty percent of case studies. In conclusion, this study suggests that unvaccinated children were much more likely to live a healthier lifestyle than those who happened to be vaccinated.
I think when it comes to sample size, age range, and locations in which this survey was taken place, are phenomenal. I think that the results can be specified and investigated more and more by a numerous number of categories just due to the sample size. However, this study did take place in 2007 which is fairly outdated since there have been more relevant studies done now.
