There are different kinds of pressures, influences and decision problems that employees face in a business organization setting. Some companies or employees choose the ethical way of doing things and some the unethical ways. One of the issues that prevails in companies is the problem of overconfidence in their own or group’s knowledge. This was highly prevalent in the Concord Resources Group case. The company continuously gave statistics which they highly relied on and assured the residents that in the long-run the garbage disposal ground will have very little effect to their county and the environment in general. Even after the residents of the county showed resistance to this, they kept coming up with reasons and incentives so that they could persuade the people to allow them to give in to their proposal. It can be said that the company was only looking out for themselves and had no interest in serving to the people’s interest.
They blamed people’s emotionalism to come in the way of their judgement. Therefore, we can say that this case also relates to the issue of moral insensitivity towards the Clarion county residents. When undertaking such a project which people might be sensitive to, it is important to be considerate about how people might react to it. On the other hand, a good example of a company handling situations with moral sensitivity can be witnessed in the AltaGas paper. AltaGas was aware that the Tahltan tribe was sensitive to any change and how it might affect them and therefore the company decided to coordinate with the tribe and take further steps, AtlaGas did not callously announce their project to the residents but understood their expectations and then took steps. The problem of psychological distance from potential victims came into play with the Concord Resources Group case.
Another influence that can be seen in the business environment is problem the threat-rigidity response, i.e., moral judgement about which course of action to take when faced with a moral dilemma. This is seen in the Axel Springer case. In the paper it is being discussed how the problem of mineral conflict increases to such an extent that it becomes a public debate topic which puts Florian Nehm in a dilemma about the future of sustainability of media. In the paper, he debates over what would be the right course of action for the future of the company which is what moral judgement talks about. This shows a strong internalized framework within the company and hence portraying a positive example of influence.
127 our experts are availableright now
The fourth problem discussed in the paper is the failure to consider relevant consequences or problems in considering and measuring consequences, i.e., moral motivation. This can be seen in the Kitchen’s Best Case. There were a series of malpractices going on in the company but the one suits the best for this problem is Chan Dong-Hwa turning a blind eye towards Ma as long as he was able to generate more business and business relationships. It is clear that there was more importance given to power, advancement and getting things done. Even when Henry Chan took over, he ignored this even though he was not comfortable with it mainly because of psychological distance among the employees which does not show a strong manager-employee relation which possibly might have led to the series of malpractices that occurred within the company. A lot of rationalization also took place in the company assuming that incentives or bribery are a part of the culture and therefore didn’t seem to be morally wrong as they weren’t hurting anyone in the process of doing so.
Lastly, the issue discussed in the paper is of moral character. This includes the ability to control one’s responses without being distracted and to self-regulate one’s behavior toward a desired end. A good example of moral character can be seen in the Axel Springer case. One of the major corporate values among others that the company followed was integrity. After being questioned how much forest does the magazine cost, the company committed itself to safeguard social and environmental standard for their paper production and took appropriate actions to reduce the effect on the environment. The company even voluntarily published its sustainability report which showed its compliance towards the environment which put the company in a respectable platform. Therefore, it can be said that it majorly depends on the what course of action a company or manager takes to a given problem that portrays its ethicality.
