There can’t be happiness without suffering. The important characters, the child locked up and the people in Omelas in “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” by Ursula K. Le Guin, helps convey the central idea that Indeed, even in her envisioned city of impeccable happiness, LeGuin demands that one child must endure outrageous disregard and torment therefore the people Omelas can enjoy being happy. Throughout the story, Le Guin uses characterization of the people in Omelas and the child, the setting, and the major conflict seen throughout the story to convey the central idea.
The setting of Omelas is a city that is depicted as a Utopian spot made from happiness. It’s understood that Utopia, the possibility of an ideal spot is fictionalized; in any case, a couple of individuals choose to acknowledge just the opposite. “They were not simple folk, you see, though they were happy. But we do not say the words of cheer much anymore. All smiles have become archaic” (733).
Omelas does not seem to fit the entire importance of Utopia, in light of the fact that the individuals are not controlled at all, they act freely, have good things, and continue on with their life, in light of the fact that the author said they were not “bland utopians,” or “simple folk,” or “dulcet shepherds” (733) that they fundamentally lived. In any case, one would utilize that reference to mimic an image of what Omelas by and large take after. This is the reason one may accept that Omelas was intended to symbolize Utopia.
The way Le Guin characterizes the child whose hopeless and isolated experience definitely separates from those at the Festival of Summer. In the beginning Le Guin concentrated on portraying the staggering bliss of Omelas overall, they presently turn their fixation to the suffering child who is locked up in “a basement under one of the beautiful public buildings of Omelas, or perhaps in the cellar of one of its spacious private homes” (735). The child encounters enduring in all parts of its life: mental, emotional, and physical. Its reality could not be any different from the other kids-perfect childhood.
The child wants to be free so bad, it asks its guests for help. Where the cries and clamor from the Festival of Summer showed bliss, the child’s cries and commotions demonstrate sadness and isolation. While the children of Omelas are running around without clothes, in light of the fact that they are liberated from disgrace, the child is naked on the grounds that it needs appropriate nourishment. While the children of Omelas eat delicious treats at the Festival of Summer, the child is restricted to ‘corn meal and grease a day’ (735).
The vital conflict is the citizens of Omelas go to the accord that there is no hope for the kid, and nothing ought to be done. To help this one hopeless child would prompt the suffering of the whole city, all things considered. This is the thing that Le Guin convinces us to think. She utilizes numerous techniques to demonstrate her point. For example, she discloses to us that if the kid was to be released, “in that day and hour all the prosperity and beauty and delight of Omelas would wither and are destroyed” (736).
She shields the individuals of Omelas, who are unsympathetic, cruel, careless ‘simple utopians,’ however rather as ‘passionate’, smart, and gentle people fit for compassion. In any case, they comprehend that ‘the beauty of their city, the tenderness of their friendships, the health of their children, the wisdom of their scholars…the kindly weathers of their skies, depend wholly on this child’s abominable misery” (735). While the citizens of Omelas legitimize the child that is suffering, they don’t trifle with this choice.
The information on the enduring kid forces them to perceive the relation of suffering and happiness. Despite the fact that they understand that they are obliged to the child, they don’t want to help it. there is no happiness without suffering, the citizens of Omelas either accept this or leave. Despite the very fact that the people of Omelas are those who cash in on the child’s fate. They realize that they are stuck in this situation as much as the child is sealed in basement
To conclude, the child’s characterization, the conflict among the citizens and the child, and the city itself really helps the central idea.