Arguments For and Against Net Neutrality

This is FREE sample
This text is free, available online and used for guidance and inspiration. Need a 100% unique paper? Order a custom essay.
  • Any subject
  • Within the deadline
  • Without paying in advance
Get custom essay

Net neutrality refers to the principle that every web site and user has the right to the same internet network speed and access. Net neutrality is that concept that all internet traffic should be treated fairly, without unfairly penalizing. I have three arguments as to why net neutrality should be maintained and three reasons why it should be eliminated.

The first reason it should be maintained is because of freedom of expression. If it’s legal, any blog or website or news service is available online under the concept of net neutrality. Net neutrality lets the people in the world have a voice online.

The second reason it should be maintained is because it promotes innovation and competition. An open internet ensures that larger companies don’t have yet another advantage over a tiny startup. It’s a level playing field on the internet, where everything is delivered as fast as possible to the end user.

The last reason it should be maintained is because of the unrestricted access that we have .Net neutrality squashes the potential for internet fast lanes, where internet service providers can charge content creators for enough bandwidth to deliver their service properly. It also prevents the possibility of providers charging end users an extra fee to access vital services, like online banking or email, or entertainment platforms like gaming networks.

The first reason it should be eliminated is because there would be no free internet access. Advocates for less oversight of internet service providers say that allowing them to charge for access to some content would lead to free access to certain sites.

The second reason it should be eliminated is because we would be protected from porn and objectionable content thrives. Some opponents of net neutrality lament how easily accessible legal but age-sensitive content like pornography is. If an internet service provider could block these services at a network-wide level, this would go a long way to solving this issue. Providers could also crack down on peer-to-peer file-sharing, which is responsible for a lot of illegal downloads, thus preventing piracy.

The last reason why it should be eliminated is because with it we have less network innovation. The rise of bandwidth-heavy web services like video streaming and content downloads means internet service providers have less money to spend on upgrading their networks. I would say if we maintain it or eliminate it would impact the digital divide because both sides prosper from it and both lose something from it.


Cite this paper

Arguments For and Against Net Neutrality. (2021, Jun 23). Retrieved from https://samploon.com/arguments-for-and-against-net-neutrality/



Is net neutrality unethical?
No, net neutrality is not unethical. It is the principle that all traffic on the internet should be treated equally, without discrimination.
What are the ethical issues concerning net neutrality?
The ethical issues concerning net neutrality are that it could lead to internet providers discriminating against certain types of content or websites, and that it could lead to a two-tiered internet with different speeds for different types of traffic.
Who is usually against net neutrality?
Internet service providers are usually against net neutrality. They argue that they should be able to manage their networks as they see fit.
We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Peter is on the line!

Don't settle for a cookie-cutter essay. Receive a tailored piece that meets your specific needs and requirements.

Check it out