What exactly would our society today be considered as? Would it be insane and absurd or would we have a Buddhist ideology? Would we be a successful and thriving society or one in which many things are failing as we are bound to? Do these questions have any real answers or is it all just philosophy? Does this world represent such values as approached above? Does society make such values or is it bound to be predetermined by ourselves? These are questions which have been discussed all semester. Absurdness and Buddhism have been challenged by our class many times. We are a fast paced society which moves at an increasingly speed in many places. Urban areas are beginning to oven/vhelm rural towns as they gain more influence within the state and the nation. The new generation of college and high school students are more involved in technology as a means of learning. Teachers are learning new forms of connecting to those who were incapable of learning in traditional ways.
Our society has evolutionized into a society which is completely different from a century or even a decade ago. Our means of transportation has changed from chariots to self- driving, autonomous, vehicles. In essence, we are a society which is hyper-connected, fast—paced, and more reliant on technology more than ever before. We worry about many things which creates abundant rules upon many things. We stress over everything, in fact, the stress rate of a college student is at the same level or higher than that of a person within an insane asylum 50 years ago. All of this leads to one thing: meaning in life. Absurdism believes that man’s search for meaning within life if futile. Camus does state though that does not mean killing yourself as we must revolt against life.
Buddhism would see such a thing as a problem with self and a greater problem with the relationship to the world In fact Camus states: “For if i try to grasp this self of which I am assured, if I try to define it and to sum it up, it is no more than a liquid that flows between my fingers I can depict one by one all the faces that it can assume; all those given it, too, by this education“? Self in Buddhism would be used in a different sense as it would be deeply reflected upon via the use meditation. I think a bigger question arises right here would Buddhism establish self as a static or a dynamic item in life? This is the mystery. Although, in Buddhism we do learn that this question should be discredited as it is about presumptions. Buddhism is all about realizing who you are through the use of meditation and from that learning in terms of what you do. This would cause you to live a lot slower, eliminate procrastination, and in turn these things would cause you to be able to appreciate the ascetics more.
127 our experts are availableright now
This would seem absurd according to Camus point of view as he would see a completely different viewpoint. The fact that you can enjoy such a world as this one we live in, but at the same time this world you must not feel too important in as we can’t ultimately change our destiny Ultimately, according to Buddhism, the real meaning of life can be found in the beauty that surrounds you and the happiness with suffering that cause us to be more than just self-definitions. Consequently, when discussing Camus reflecting upon what you are doing and the results of what is currently happening can be ignored, although realizing those consequences are important. These are important as this is you revolt against the world we live in. What about society today?
What should be said about our society? Going in with the knowledge many have little time to read a book or even enjoy life because it is too busy we can consequently agree we have an approach much like Camus whereas we run a very busy life and tend to not have time to think about the consequences on very petty tasks due to our lack of time. Will this cause us to succeed? I think this question no one can answer as both seem like ways to live. Both of these are very philosophical views which can represent a much bigger picture of life. They are without answers but have been proven during the duration of time. The geography of the world represents all different ideologies and philosophical theories which are present within our world.
This geography represents the way you will live your life and how you will go about such a life. From that I do believe that society makes up not only how we live our lives, but our values. Absurdism and Buddhism tend to disagree upon common beliefs. These are completely different ideologies on how to live life, but in the end they do share one thing: living life well in their views. Even though the way to achieve this may differ it is based upon the meaning of life which will establish the course for the rest of your life. This will establish your bias, beliefs, and habits. There is not one right way as everyone is different, although these are ways in which you could base upon faiths.
These are sculpted by society and molded upon the community you live by. Such ways can be viewed as a one minded way of thinking, although people use such ways to live every day. We are now in a hyper-connected society more tied than technology and with more information at our fingertips, we begin to question our meaning at a much more increased pace. The one question I will continue to struggle with is the meaning of life as I find it hard to accept both ways and seeing that technology is and will continue to replace us what is it? According to Camus: It is to revolt against the world, whereas Buddhism is taking life slow, enjoying the beauty, but discovering ourselves which will enable us to do the latter.
